lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 19 May 2017 08:46:41 +0800
From:   Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@...il.com>
To:     Gang He <ghe@...e.com>, jlbec@...lplan.org, mfasheh@...sity.com
Cc:     ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: give an obvious tip for dismatch
 cluster names

Hi Gang,

As you described, only fsdlm will return this error and fsdlm has
already print the same message. So why should we add it outside again?

Thanks,
Joseph

On 17/5/18 18:43, Gang He wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
> 
> 
>>>>
>> Hi Gang,
>>
>> How can we confirm EBADR is only because cluster name mismatch?
>> Since the cluster stack may be o2cb(o2dlm) or user(fsdlm).
> I looked through all the code of OCFS2 (include o2cb), there is not any place which returns this error.
> In fact, the function calling patch ocfs2_fill_super -> ocfs2_mount_volume -> ocfs2_dlm_init -> dlm_new_lockspace
> is very specific path, we can use this errorno to give the uses a more clear tip, 
> since this case looks like a little common during cluster migration, but the customer can quickly
> get the failure cause if there is a error printing.
> Also, I think there is not possible to add this errorno in o2cb path during ocfs2_dlm_init, since o2cb code has been stable for 
> a long time.   
> 
> Thanks
> Gang
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Joseph
>>
>> On 17/5/18 14:35, Gang He wrote:
>>> This patch is used to add an obvious error message, due to
>>> dismatch cluster names between on-disk and in the current cluster.
>>> We can meet this case during OCFS2 cluster migration, if we can
>>> give the user an obvious tip for why they can not mount the file
>>> system after migration, they can quickly fix this dismatch problem.
>>> Second, also move printing ocfs2_fill_super() errno to the front
>>> of ocfs2_dismount_volume() function, since ocfs2_dismount_volume()
>>> will also print it's own message.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gang He <ghe@...e.com>
>>> ---
>>>  fs/ocfs2/super.c | 8 ++++++--
>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/super.c b/fs/ocfs2/super.c
>>> index ca1646f..5575918 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/super.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/super.c
>>> @@ -1208,14 +1208,15 @@ static int ocfs2_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, 
>> void *data, int silent)
>>>  read_super_error:
>>>  	brelse(bh);
>>>  
>>> +	if (status)
>>> +		mlog_errno(status);
>>> +
>>>  	if (osb) {
>>>  		atomic_set(&osb->vol_state, VOLUME_DISABLED);
>>>  		wake_up(&osb->osb_mount_event);
>>>  		ocfs2_dismount_volume(sb, 1);
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>> -	if (status)
>>> -		mlog_errno(status);
>>>  	return status;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> @@ -1843,6 +1844,9 @@ static int ocfs2_mount_volume(struct super_block *sb)
>>>  	status = ocfs2_dlm_init(osb);
>>>  	if (status < 0) {
>>>  		mlog_errno(status);
>>> +		if (status == -EBADR)
>>> +			mlog(ML_ERROR, "couldn't mount because cluster name on"
>>> +			" disk does not match the running cluster name.\n");
>>>  		goto leave;
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ