lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 21 May 2017 15:06:52 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Cc:     linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sascha Weisenberger <sascha.weisenberger@...mens.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] iio: adc: Add support for TI ADC108S102 and ADC128S102

On 21/05/17 13:44, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2017-05-21 14:18, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 21/05/17 13:17, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>> On 21/05/17 12:59, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> On 2017-05-21 12:47, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>>>> On 17/05/17 16:28, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>>> This is an upstream port of an IIO driver for the TI ADC108S102 and
>>>>>> ADC128S102. The former can be found on the Intel Galileo Gen2 and the
>>>>>> Siemens SIMATIC IOT2000. For those boards, ACPI-based enumeration is
>>>>>> included.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Due to the lack of regulators under ACPI, we hard-code the voltage
>>>>>> provided to the VA pin of the ADC to 5 V, the value used on Galileo
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> IOT2000. For DT usage, the regulator "vref-supply" provides this
>>>>>> information. Note that DT usage has not been tested.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Original author: Bogdan Pricop <bogdan.pricop@...tex.com>
>>>>>> Ported from Intel Galileo Gen2 BSP to Intel Yocto kernel:
>>>>>> Todor Minchev <todor@...chev.co.uk>.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
>>>>> Still an issue wrt to it being obviously correct in the ordering in
>>>>> probe
>>>>> and remove.
>>>>>
>>>>> As a reviewer I want to be able to run through each step in probe and
>>>>> compare with remove to ensure they occur in the opposite order and
>>>>> reverse all the steps in probe.  Where ever it deviates from that I
>>>>> have
>>>>> to think about it and we all know the last thing a reviewer with a big
>>>>> backlog of patches wants to do is to think hard ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyhow, I've fixed up and applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and
>>>>> pushed out as testing for the autobuilders to play with it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please check I haven't made a mess of it.
>>>>
>>>> Forgot to push? Not finding it in togreg, which is 5 days old.
>>>>
>>> As it says, pushed out as testing...  Togreg is non rebasing so only
>>> gets pushed out publicly once all the trivial stuff the autobuilders
>>> find has been sorted.
>>>
>>> Depending on how busy I am it can be a few days before I get a chance
>>> to push out togreg, whereas testing goes every few patches when I'm
>>> merging stuff.
>> Mind you I hadn't pushed that for half an hour or so hence that might
>> have been out of date too ;)
> 
> OK, now I see what went wrong: Please have a second look at commit
> 52d4de2441af... ;)
> 
> Jan
> 
Gah!  Thanks.  I knew I did that initially but thought I'd unwound the mess.
Seems not - here goes again for trying not to be an idiot.

Thanks for pointing this mess out.
J

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ