linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel, watchdog: Switch NMI watchdog to ref cycles on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 22 May 2017 14:04:24 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     kan.liang@...el.com
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, eranian@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, acme@...hat.com,
        jolsa@...hat.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, vincent.weaver@...ne.edu, ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel, watchdog: Switch NMI watchdog to ref
 cycles on x86

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 02:03:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:06:22AM -0700, kan.liang@...el.com wrote:
> > This patch was once merged, but reverted later.
> > Because ref-cycles can not be used anymore when watchdog is enabled.
> > The commit is 44530d588e142a96cf0cd345a7cb8911c4f88720
> > 
> > The patch 1/2 has extended the ref-cycles to GP counter. The concern
> > should be gone.
> 
> So its not a problem if every Atom prior to Goldmont, and all Core/Core2
> products regress?
> 
> P6 and P4 you've entirely broken, as they don't have REF_CPU_CYCLES at all.

 + KNC

> 
> So no, I don't think this is right even now.
> 
>