linux-kernel - Re: mm, something wring in page_lock_anon_vma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 22 May 2017 12:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:     Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
cc:     Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, aarcange@...hat.com,
        sumeet.keswani@....com, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: mm, something wring in page_lock_anon_vma_read()?

On Mon, 22 May 2017, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> On 2017/5/20 10:40, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 May 2017, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> >>
> >> Here is a bug report form redhat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305620
> >> And I meet the bug too. However it is hard to reproduce, and 
> >> 624483f3ea82598("mm: rmap: fix use-after-free in __put_anon_vma") is not help.
> >>
> >> From the vmcore, it seems that the page is still mapped(_mapcount=0 and _count=2),
> >> and the value of mapping is a valid address(mapping = 0xffff8801b3e2a101),
> >> but anon_vma has been corrupted.
> >>
> >> Any ideas?
> > 
> > Sorry, no.  I assume that _mapcount has been misaccounted, for example
> > a pte mapped in on top of another pte; but cannot begin tell you where
> 
> Hi Hugh,
> 
> What does "a pte mapped in on top of another pte" mean? Could you give more info?

I mean, there are various places in mm/memory.c which decide what they
intend to do based on orig_pte, then take pte lock, then check that
pte_same(pte, orig_pte) before taking it any further.  If a pte_same()
check were missing (I do not know of any such case), then two racing
tasks might install the same pte, one on top of the other - page
mapcount being incremented twice, but decremented only once when
that pte is finally unmapped later.

Please see similar discussion in the earlier thread at
marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=148222656211837&w=2

Hugh

> 
> Thanks,
> Xishi Qiu
> 
> > in Red Hat's kernel-3.10.0-229.4.2.el7 that might happen.
> > 
> > Hugh