lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 22 May 2017 23:11:52 -0500
From:   "Li, Yi" <yi1.li@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>
Cc:     mcgrof@...nel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        wagi@...om.org, dwmw2@...radead.org, rafal@...ecki.pl,
        arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>, pmladek@...e.com,
        johannes.berg@...el.com, emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com,
        luciano.coelho@...el.com, kvalo@...eaurora.org, luto@...nel.org,
        takahiro.akashi@...aro.org, dhowells@...hat.com, pjones@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] fpga_mgr: Add streaming support through the new
 driver_data API

hi Alan


On 5/22/2017 4:09 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 1:49 AM,  <yi1.li@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Yi,
>
>> From: Yi Li <yi1.li@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> Since the FPGA image are getting bigger in size, this add an new API
>> fpga_mgr_firmware_stream
> You could replace the guts of the current fpga_mgr_firmware_load()
> with this new API (keep the old name).  Unless anyone can think of a
> reason to keep my old memory hog version.  Assuming this all works :)
>
>> in FPGA manager, which will stream FPGA image in
>> 4KB trunks.
> chunks?
Oops.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Yi Li <yi1.li@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/fpga/fpga-mgr.c       | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/linux/fpga/fpga-mgr.h |   4 ++
>>   2 files changed, 115 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/fpga-mgr.c b/drivers/fpga/fpga-mgr.c
>> index 188ffef..420ee38 100644
>> --- a/drivers/fpga/fpga-mgr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/fpga/fpga-mgr.c
>> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
>>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>>   #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
>>   #include <linux/highmem.h>
>> +#include <linux/sizes.h>
>> +#include <linux/driver_data.h>
>>
>>   static DEFINE_IDA(fpga_mgr_ida);
>>   static struct class *fpga_mgr_class;
>> @@ -196,6 +198,115 @@ static int fpga_mgr_buf_load_mapped(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
>>          return fpga_mgr_write_complete(mgr, info);
>>   }
>>
>> +struct fpga_mgr_streaming_priv_params {
> This name is boggling my mind. :-) Something can be private or it can
> be params, but it seems like params aren't really private.  And later
> it's referred to as 'params' although it's really private data.  Could
> you rename and take off the _params?  That way when I'm reading
> through this, I'll know that this is something that this code is
> really passing to itself and I won't mistakenly think that this is a
> struct that is being passed for the firmware code to consume.

Okay, will rename the structure to fpga_mgr_streaming_context?
>
>> +       struct fpga_image_info *info;
>> +       struct fpga_manager *mgr;
>> +       loff_t offset;
>> +       loff_t fw_size;
>> +};
>> +
> Please add a comment here explaining that this is the callback
> function, called back from the firmware code for each 4K chunk of FPGA
> image.

Sure, will do.
>> +static int fpga_mgr_streaming_fw_cb(void *context, const struct firmware *fw,
>> +                                   int err)
>> +{
>> +       int ret = -EINVAL;
>> +       struct fpga_mgr_streaming_priv_params *params =
> And please call this 'priv' or something with 'priv' in the name?

Okay, struct fpga_mgr_streaming_context *streaming_context?
>
>> +               (struct fpga_mgr_streaming_priv_params *)context;
>> +       struct fpga_image_info *info = params->info;
>> +       struct fpga_manager *mgr = params->mgr;
>> +       struct device *dev = &mgr->dev;
>> +
>> +       params->fw_size = fw->size;
> Please skip a line here.
Thanks for catching that.
>
>> +       /*
>> +        * init.
>> +        */
> /* A one line comment should be like this, not 3 lines. */
Thanks for catching that.
>
>> +       if (params->offset == 0) {
>> +               ret = fpga_mgr_write_init_buf(mgr, info, fw->data, fw->size);
>> +               if (ret)
>> +                       return ret;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       /*
>> +        * Write the FPGA image to the FPGA.
>> +        */
> /* Write the FPGA image to the FPGA. */
>
>> +       mgr->state = FPGA_MGR_STATE_WRITE;
>> +       ret = mgr->mops->write(mgr, fw->data, fw->size);
>> +       if (ret) {
>> +               dev_err(dev, "Error while writing image data to FPGA\n");
>> +               mgr->state = FPGA_MGR_STATE_WRITE_ERR;
>> +               return ret;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       if (fw->size < SZ_4K)
> Define a macro before the function and use it everywhere SZ_4K means
> the same thing here (3 occurrences), such as
>
> #define FW_CHUNK_SZ     SZ_4K
Okay.
>
>> +               ret = fpga_mgr_write_complete(mgr, info);
>> +
>> +       return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * fpga_mgr_firmware_stream - streaming firmware and load to fpga
>> + * @mgr:       fpga manager
>> + * @info:      fpga image specific information
>> + * @image_name:        name of image file on the firmware search path
>> + *
>> + * Streaming an FPGA image using the firmware class, then write out to the FPGA.
>> + * Update the state before each step to provide info on what step failed if
>> + * there is a failure.  This code assumes the caller got the mgr pointer
>> + * from of_fpga_mgr_get() or fpga_mgr_get() and checked that it is not an error
>> + * code.
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code otherwise.
>> + */
>> +int fpga_mgr_firmware_stream(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
>> +                            struct fpga_image_info *info,
>> +                            const char *image_name)
>> +{
>> +       int ret;
>> +       char *path = NULL;
>> +       void *buf;
>> +       size_t length = INT_MAX;
> I guess the firmware layer doesn't give us the size of the whole
> firmware, so length is used for the while() below, right?  Too bad
> since everybody using streaming firmware is going to be writing this
> same type of while statement.
Yes, with the non-streaming new driver_data_request_xx case, it will 
give the firmware structure with the size of image length.  But with the 
streaming case, we will not know the size of the image file until it 
reach to the end of the file.

>
>> +       struct device *dev = &mgr->dev;
>> +       struct fpga_mgr_streaming_priv_params params = {
> priv
>
>> +               .info = info,
>> +               .mgr = mgr,
>> +               .fw_size = 0,
>> +               .offset = 0,
>> +       };
>> +
>> +       const struct driver_data_req_params req_params = {
>> +               DRIVER_DATA_DEFAULT_SYNC(fpga_mgr_streaming_fw_cb, &params),
>> +               .reqs = DRIVER_DATA_REQ_NO_CACHE | DRIVER_DATA_REQ_STREAMING,
>> +               .alloc_buf_size = SZ_4K,
> FW_CHUNK_SZ or whatever name is appropriate.
>
>> +               .alloc_buf = &buf,
>> +               .img_offset = &params.offset,
>> +               .path = &path,
>> +       };
>> +
>> +       buf = kmalloc(SZ_4K, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +       if (!buf) {
>> +               dev_err(dev, "%s: kmalloc buf failed\n", __func__);
> This message isn't needed.
Got it
>
>> +               return -ENOMEM;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       mgr->state = FPGA_MGR_STATE_FIRMWARE_REQ;
>> +       while (length > 0) {
> This could be "do { ... } while ((params.fw_size >= FIRMWARE_CHUNK_SZ)
> && (length > 0));" since that's what it's really doing.
Yes, this is better, thanks.

>
>> +               ret = driver_data_request_sync(image_name, &req_params, dev);
>> +               if (ret) {
>> +                       dev_err(dev, "Error reading firmware %d\n", ret);
>> +                       mgr->state = FPGA_MGR_STATE_FIRMWARE_REQ_ERR;
>> +                       return ret;
>> +               }
>> +
>> +               length -= params.fw_size;
>> +               params.offset += params.fw_size;
>> +               if (params.fw_size < SZ_4K)
>> +                       break;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       kfree(buf);
> Please skip a line before return.
>
>> +       return ret;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_mgr_firmware_stream);
> Thanks for working on this!
>
> Alan
>
>> +
>>   /**
>>    * fpga_mgr_buf_load - load fpga from image in buffer
>>    * @mgr:       fpga manager
>> diff --git a/include/linux/fpga/fpga-mgr.h b/include/linux/fpga/fpga-mgr.h
>> index b4ac24c..083e091 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/fpga/fpga-mgr.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/fpga/fpga-mgr.h
>> @@ -143,6 +143,10 @@ int fpga_mgr_firmware_load(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
>>                             struct fpga_image_info *info,
>>                             const char *image_name);
>>
>> +int fpga_mgr_firmware_stream(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
>> +                            struct fpga_image_info *info,
>> +                            const char *image_name);
>> +
>>   struct fpga_manager *of_fpga_mgr_get(struct device_node *node);
>>
>>   struct fpga_manager *fpga_mgr_get(struct device *dev);
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ