linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] printk: add __printf attributes to internal functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 25 May 2017 13:29:02 +0200
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc:     Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@....org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] printk: add __printf attributes to internal
 functions

On Wed 2017-05-24 07:49:50, Nicolas Iooss wrote:
> When compiling with -Wsuggest-attribute=format, gcc complains that some
> functions in kernel/printk/printk_safe.c transmit their argument to
> printf-like functions without having a printf attribute. Silence these
> warnings by adding relevant __printf attributes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@....org>
> Acked-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> ---
> v2: add __printf attribute to the definition of vprintk_nmi() which is
> used when CONFIG_PRINTK_NMI is not defined.

Sergey, I believe that that your Reviewed-by is still valid even after
this small update. Is that true, please?

Best Regards,
Petr