lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 02:01:19 +0200 From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, Sascha Weisenberger <sascha.weisenberger@...mens.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] serial/gpio: exar: Fixes and support for IOT2000 On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote: > On 2017-05-29 14:39, Linus Walleij wrote: >> Should I merge them all? Should Greg merge them all? >> Should one of us produce an immutable branch? > > Half of the patch are affecting both serial and GPIO subsystem, most > have GPIO focus, though. Just patch 10 or more serial than GPIO. All in > all, maybe Greg can ack and things can flow through the GPIO tree? OK with me, let's see what Greg says. Yours, Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists