linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] mm: vmstat: move slab statistics from zone to node counters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 31 May 2017 20:11:51 +0300
From:   Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
To:     Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] mm: vmstat: move slab statistics from zone to node
 counters

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 01:39:00PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:12:56AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 02:17:20PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > To re-implement slab cache vs. page cache balancing, we'll need the
> > > slab counters at the lruvec level, which, ever since lru reclaim was
> > > moved from the zone to the node, is the intersection of the node, not
> > > the zone, and the memcg.
> > > 
> > > We could retain the per-zone counters for when the page allocator
> > > dumps its memory information on failures, and have counters on both
> > > levels - which on all but NUMA node 0 is usually redundant. But let's
> > > keep it simple for now and just move them. If anybody complains we can
> > > restore the per-zone counters.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> > 
> > This patch causes an early boot crash on s390 (linux-next as of today).
> > CONFIG_NUMA on/off doesn't make any difference. I haven't looked any
> > further into this yet, maybe you have an idea?

The same on arm64.

Yury