linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the target-bva tree with the target-updates tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Jun 2017 14:14:06 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
To:     "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
CC:     "sfr@...b.auug.org.au" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the target-bva tree with the
 target-updates tree

On 05/31/17 22:04, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> Go ahead and get list review on drivers/target/ changes before pushing
> them into linux-next, please.
> 
> Btw, I don't care if you queue up one's that do have at least two
> Reviewed-bys into your tree, but everything that doesn't have
> Reviewed-bys or Acked-by should not be going into linux-next.

It is not your job to rewrite the rules for linux-next. I'm following
the guidelines I received from Stephen in December 2016. You were copied
on the e-mail with guidelines Stephen sent to me. See also
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-next/msg38488.html.

Stephen, if anything would have changed in the meantime that I'm not
aware of please let me know.

Bart.