| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:28:12 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] irqdomain: Add irq_domain_{push,pop}_irq()
functions.
On 07/06/17 17:09, Tim Harvey wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 6:05 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>> Sorry for top posting but we need to loop in Bjorn Helgass and the
>> linux-pci mailing list on this patch, at least so they see it, and can
>> recognize similar cases in the future.
>>
>> (The patch set if very nice.)
>>
>> Yours,
>> Linus Walleij
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 7:21 PM, David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com> wrote:
>>> For an already existing irqdomain hierarchy, as might be obtained via
>>> a call to pci_enable_msix_range(), a PCI driver wishing to add an
>>> additional irqdomain to the hierarchy needs to be able to insert the
>>> irqdomain to that already initialized hierarchy. Calling
>>> irq_domain_create_hierarchy() allows the new irqdomain to be created,
>>> but no existing code allows for initializing the associated irq_data.
>>>
>>> Add a couple of helper functions (irq_domain_push_irq() and
>>> irq_domain_pop_irq()) to initialize the irq_data for the new
>>> irqdomain added to an existing hierarchy.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/irqdomain.h | 3 +
>>> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 178 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 181 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
>>> index 9f36160..0316846 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
>>> @@ -425,6 +425,9 @@ extern void irq_domain_free_irqs_common(struct irq_domain *domain,
>>> extern void irq_domain_free_irqs_top(struct irq_domain *domain,
>>> unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs);
>>>
>>> +extern int irq_domain_push_irq(struct irq_domain *domain, int virq, void *arg);
>>> +extern int irq_domain_pop_irq(struct irq_domain *domain, int virq);
>>> +
>>> extern int irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent(struct irq_domain *domain,
>>> unsigned int irq_base,
>>> unsigned int nr_irqs, void *arg);
>>> diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
>>> index 31805f2..ea9d30d 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
>>> @@ -1304,6 +1304,184 @@ int __irq_domain_alloc_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain, int irq_base,
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/* The irq_data was moved, fix the revmap to refer to the new location */
>>> +static void irq_domain_fix_revmap(struct irq_data *d)
>>> +{
>>> + void **slot;
>>> +
>>> + if (d->hwirq < d->domain->revmap_size)
>>> + return; /* Not using radix tree. */
>>> +
>>> + /* Fix up the revmap. */
>>> + mutex_lock(&revmap_trees_mutex);
>>> + slot = radix_tree_lookup_slot(&d->domain->revmap_tree, d->hwirq);
>>> + if (slot)
>>> + radix_tree_replace_slot(&d->domain->revmap_tree, slot, d);
>>> + mutex_unlock(&revmap_trees_mutex);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * irq_domain_push_irq() - Push a domain in to the top of a hierarchy.
>>> + * @domain: Domain to push.
>>> + * @virq: Irq to push the domain in to.
>>> + * @arg: Passed to the irq_domain_ops alloc() function.
>>> + *
>>> + * For an already existing irqdomain hierarchy, as might be obtained
>>> + * via a call to pci_enable_msix(), add an additional domain to the
>>> + * head of the processing chain. Must be called before request_irq()
>>> + * has been called.
>>> + */
>>> +int irq_domain_push_irq(struct irq_domain *domain, int virq, void *arg)
>>> +{
>>> + struct irq_data *child_irq_data;
>>> + struct irq_data *root_irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(virq);
>>> + struct irq_desc *desc;
>>> + int rv = 0;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Check that no action has been set, which indicates the virq
>>> + * is in a state where this function doesn't have to deal with
>>> + * races between interrupt handling and maintaining the
>>> + * hierarchy. This will catch gross misuse. Attempting to
>>> + * make the check race free would require holding locks across
>>> + * calls to struct irq_domain_ops->alloc(), which could lead
>>> + * to deadlock, so we just do a simple check before starting.
>>> + */
>>> + desc = irq_to_desc(virq);
>>> + if (!desc)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + if (WARN_ON(desc->action))
>>> + return -EBUSY;
>>> +
>>> + if (domain == NULL)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + if (WARN_ON(!domain->ops->alloc))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + if (!root_irq_data)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + child_irq_data = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*child_irq_data), GFP_KERNEL,
>>> + irq_data_get_node(root_irq_data));
>>> + if (!child_irq_data)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> + mutex_lock(&irq_domain_mutex);
>>> +
>>> + /* Copy the original irq_data. */
>>> + *child_irq_data = *root_irq_data;
>>> +
>>> + irq_domain_fix_revmap(child_irq_data);
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Overwrite the root_irq_data, which is embedded in struct
>>> + * irq_desc, with values for this domain.
>>> + */
>>> + root_irq_data->parent_data = child_irq_data;
>>> + root_irq_data->domain = domain;
>>> + root_irq_data->mask = 0;
>>> + root_irq_data->hwirq = 0;
>>> + root_irq_data->chip = NULL;
>>> + root_irq_data->chip_data = NULL;
>>> + rv = domain->ops->alloc(domain, virq, 1, arg);
>>> + if (rv) {
>>> + /* Restore the original irq_data. */
>>> + *root_irq_data = *child_irq_data;
>>> + irq_domain_fix_revmap(root_irq_data);
>>> + goto error;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (root_irq_data->hwirq < domain->revmap_size) {
>>> + domain->linear_revmap[root_irq_data->hwirq] = virq;
>>> + } else {
>>> + mutex_lock(&revmap_trees_mutex);
>>> + radix_tree_insert(&domain->revmap_tree,
>>> + root_irq_data->hwirq, root_irq_data);
>>> + mutex_unlock(&revmap_trees_mutex);
>>> + }
>>> +error:
>>> + mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex);
>>> +
>>> + return rv;
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_domain_push_irq);
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * irq_domain_pop_irq() - Remove a domain from the top of a hierarchy.
>>> + * @domain: Domain to remove.
>>> + * @virq: Irq to remove the domain from.
>>> + *
>>> + * Undo the effects of a call to irq_domain_push_irq(). Must be
>>> + * called either before request_irq() or after free_irq().
>>> + */
>>> +int irq_domain_pop_irq(struct irq_domain *domain, int virq)
>>> +{
>>> + struct irq_data *root_irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(virq);
>>> + struct irq_data *child_irq_data;
>>> + struct irq_data *tmp_irq_data;
>>> + struct irq_desc *desc;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Check that no action is set, which indicates the virq is in
>>> + * a state where this function doesn't have to deal with races
>>> + * between interrupt handling and maintaining the hierarchy.
>>> + * This will catch gross misuse. Attempting to make the check
>>> + * race free would require holding locks across calls to
>>> + * struct irq_domain_ops->free(), which could lead to
>>> + * deadlock, so we just do a simple check before starting.
>>> + */
>>> + desc = irq_to_desc(virq);
>>> + if (!desc)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + if (WARN_ON(desc->action))
>>> + return -EBUSY;
>>> +
>>> + if (domain == NULL)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + if (!root_irq_data)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + tmp_irq_data = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq);
>>> +
>>> + /* We can only "pop" if this domain is at the top of the list */
>>> + if (WARN_ON(root_irq_data != tmp_irq_data))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + if (WARN_ON(root_irq_data->domain != domain))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + child_irq_data = root_irq_data->parent_data;
>>> + if (WARN_ON(!child_irq_data))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + mutex_lock(&irq_domain_mutex);
>>> +
>>> + root_irq_data->parent_data = NULL;
>>> +
>>> + if (root_irq_data->hwirq >= domain->revmap_size) {
>>> + mutex_lock(&revmap_trees_mutex);
>>> + radix_tree_delete(&domain->revmap_tree, root_irq_data->hwirq);
>>> + mutex_unlock(&revmap_trees_mutex);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (domain->ops->free)
>>> + domain->ops->free(domain, virq, 1);
>>> +
>>> + /* Restore the original irq_data. */
>>> + *root_irq_data = *child_irq_data;
>>> +
>>> + irq_domain_fix_revmap(root_irq_data);
>>> +
>>> + mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex);
>>> +
>>> + kfree(child_irq_data);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_domain_pop_irq);
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * irq_domain_free_irqs - Free IRQ number and associated data structures
>>> * @virq: base IRQ number
>>> --
>>> 1.8.3.1
>>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> Linus,
>
> It looks like we are still waiting on ACK's for this from the IRQ
> folk. Are the right people cc'd? Seem's like there's been an adequate
> review period with no response.
Yup, I've been fairly busy with some other Cavium related stuff. I'll
get on it shortly...
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists