linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: reset: Add bindings for basic reset controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 7 Jun 2017 15:49:16 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
Cc:     Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: reset: Add bindings for basic reset
 controller

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 03:38:50PM +0930, Joel Stanley wrote:
> This adds the bindings documentation for a basic single-register reset
> controller.
> 
> The bindings describe a single 32-bit register that contains up to 32
> reset lines, each deasserted by clearing the appropriate bit in the
> register. Optionally a property can be provided that changes this
> behaviour to assert on clear.
> 

I think this is a good idea for kernel code, but not for bindings. We 
don't really want per register bindings. 

The problem with any generic/simple/basic binding is they always start 
that way. Then we add one property at a time not in any well planned 
way. I can easily come up with additions. For example, what about 
self-clearing reset bits. Or 2 bits per reset. Or multiple resets that 
have to be controlled together. 8 or 16-bit registers.

IRQs and GPIOs could also be described in some cases with just groups of 
32-bit registers for set,clear,status,mask,etc., but we don't do that in 
bindings for the same reasons.

Rob