| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 09:53:10 +0800
From: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
To: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mnt: umount mounts one by one in umount_tree()
On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 00:08 -0700, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> With this patch, we don't try to umount all mounts of a tree together.
> Instead of this we umount them one by one. In this case, we see a significant
> improvement in performance for the worsе case.
Indeed, umount has been very slow for a while now.
Even a moderately large number of mounts (~10000) become painfully slow.
Re you still perusing this?
Anything I can do to help?
Eric, what are your thoughts on this latest attempt?
>
> The reason of this optimization is that umount() can hold namespace_sem
> for a long time, this semaphore is global, so it affects all users.
> Recently Eric W. Biederman added a per mount namespace limit on the
> number of mounts. The default number of mounts allowed per mount
> namespace at 100,000. Currently this value is allowed to construct a tree
> which requires hours to be umounted.
>
> In a worse case the current complexity of umount_tree() is O(n^3).
> * Enumirate all mounts in a target tree (propagate_umount)
> * Enumirate mounts to find where these changes have to
> be propagated (mark_umount_candidates)
> * Enumirate mounts to find a requered mount by parent and dentry
> (__lookup_mnt). __lookup_mnt() searches a mount in m_hash, but
> the number of mounts is much bigger than a size of the hash.
>
> The worse case is when all mounts from the tree live in the same shared
> group. In this case we have to enumirate all mounts on each step.
>
> There is CVE-2016-6213 about this case.
>
> Here are results for the kernel with this patch
> $ for i in `seq 10 15`; do unshare -m sh ./run.sh $i; done
> umount -l /mnt/1 -> 0:00.00
> umount -l /mnt/1 -> 0:00.01
> umount -l /mnt/1 -> 0:00.01
> umount -l /mnt/1 -> 0:00.03
> umount -l /mnt/1 -> 0:00.07
> umount -l /mnt/1 -> 0:00.14
>
> Here are results for the kernel without this patch
> $ for i in `seq 10 15`; do unshare -m sh ./run.sh $i; done
> umount -l /mnt/1 -> 0:00.04
> umount -l /mnt/1 -> 0:00.17
> umount -l /mnt/1 -> 0:00.75
> umount -l /mnt/1 -> 0:05.96
> umount -l /mnt/1 -> 0:34.40
> umount -l /mnt/1 -> 3:46.27
>
> And here is a test script:
> $ cat run.sh
> set -e -m
>
> mount -t tmpfs zdtm /mnt
> mkdir -p /mnt/1 /mnt/2
> mount -t tmpfs zdtm /mnt/1
> mount --make-shared /mnt/1
> mkdir /mnt/1/1
>
> for i in `seq $1`; do
> ./mount --bind /mnt/1/1 /mnt/1/1
> done
>
> echo -n "umount -l /mnt/1 -> "
> /usr/bin/time -f '%E' ./umount -l /mnt/1
>
> And we need these simple mount and umount tools, because the standard
> ones read /proc/self/mountinfo, but this is extremely slow when we have
> thousands of mounts.
> $ cat mount.c
> #include <sys/mount.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> return mount(argv[2], argv[3], NULL, MS_BIND, NULL);
> }
>
> $ cat umount.c
> #include <sys/mount.h>
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> return umount2(argv[2], MNT_DETACH);
> }
>
> Here is a previous attempt to optimize this code:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/10/495
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
> ---
> fs/namespace.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> ---
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
> index 3bf0cd2..4e6f258 100644
> --- a/fs/namespace.c
> +++ b/fs/namespace.c
> @@ -1474,56 +1474,61 @@ static bool disconnect_mount(struct mount *mnt, enum
> umount_tree_flags how)
> */
> static void umount_tree(struct mount *mnt, enum umount_tree_flags how)
> {
> - LIST_HEAD(tmp_list);
> struct mount *p;
> + int done = 0;
>
> if (how & UMOUNT_PROPAGATE)
> propagate_mount_unlock(mnt);
>
> /* Gather the mounts to umount */
> - for (p = mnt; p; p = next_mnt(p, mnt)) {
> + while (!done) {
> + LIST_HEAD(tmp_list);
> +
> + p = mnt;
> + while (!list_empty(&p->mnt_mounts))
> + p = list_entry(p->mnt_mounts.next, struct mount,
> mnt_child);
> +
> p->mnt.mnt_flags |= MNT_UMOUNT;
> list_move(&p->mnt_list, &tmp_list);
> - }
> -
> - /* Hide the mounts from mnt_mounts */
> - list_for_each_entry(p, &tmp_list, mnt_list) {
> list_del_init(&p->mnt_child);
> - }
>
> - /* Add propogated mounts to the tmp_list */
> - if (how & UMOUNT_PROPAGATE)
> - propagate_umount(&tmp_list);
> -
> - while (!list_empty(&tmp_list)) {
> - struct mnt_namespace *ns;
> - bool disconnect;
> - p = list_first_entry(&tmp_list, struct mount, mnt_list);
> - list_del_init(&p->mnt_expire);
> - list_del_init(&p->mnt_list);
> - ns = p->mnt_ns;
> - if (ns) {
> - ns->mounts--;
> - __touch_mnt_namespace(ns);
> - }
> - p->mnt_ns = NULL;
> - if (how & UMOUNT_SYNC)
> - p->mnt.mnt_flags |= MNT_SYNC_UMOUNT;
> -
> - disconnect = disconnect_mount(p, how);
> -
> - pin_insert_group(&p->mnt_umount, &p->mnt_parent->mnt,
> - disconnect ? &unmounted : NULL);
> - if (mnt_has_parent(p)) {
> - mnt_add_count(p->mnt_parent, -1);
> - if (!disconnect) {
> - /* Don't forget about p */
> - list_add_tail(&p->mnt_child, &p->mnt_parent-
> >mnt_mounts);
> - } else {
> - umount_mnt(p);
> + /* Add propogated mounts to the tmp_list */
> + if (how & UMOUNT_PROPAGATE)
> + propagate_umount(&tmp_list);
> +
> + if (p == mnt)
> + done = 1;
> +
> + while (!list_empty(&tmp_list)) {
> + struct mnt_namespace *ns;
> + bool disconnect;
> + p = list_first_entry(&tmp_list, struct mount,
> mnt_list);
> + list_del_init(&p->mnt_expire);
> + list_del_init(&p->mnt_list);
> + ns = p->mnt_ns;
> + if (ns) {
> + ns->mounts--;
> + __touch_mnt_namespace(ns);
> + }
> + p->mnt_ns = NULL;
> + if (how & UMOUNT_SYNC)
> + p->mnt.mnt_flags |= MNT_SYNC_UMOUNT;
> +
> + disconnect = disconnect_mount(p, how);
> +
> + pin_insert_group(&p->mnt_umount, &p->mnt_parent->mnt,
> + disconnect ? &unmounted : NULL);
> + if (mnt_has_parent(p)) {
> + mnt_add_count(p->mnt_parent, -1);
> + if (!disconnect) {
> + /* Don't forget about p */
> + list_add_tail(&p->mnt_child, &p-
> >mnt_parent->mnt_mounts);
> + } else {
> + umount_mnt(p);
> + }
> }
> + change_mnt_propagation(p, MS_PRIVATE);
> }
> - change_mnt_propagation(p, MS_PRIVATE);
> }
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists