lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 14 Jun 2017 12:01:55 +0900
From:   "Takiguchi, Yasunari" <Yasunari.Takiguchi@...y.com>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
CC:     "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        "tbird20d@...il.com" <tbird20d@...il.com>,
        "frowand.list@...il.com" <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        "Yamamoto, Masayuki" <Masayuki.Yamamoto@...y.com>,
        "Nozawa, Hideki (STWN)" <Hideki.Nozawa@...y.com>,
        "Yonezawa, Kota" <Kota.Yonezawa@...y.com>,
        "Matsumoto, Toshihiko" <Toshihiko.Matsumoto@...y.com>,
        "Watanabe, Satoshi (SSS)" <Satoshi.C.Watanabe@...y.com>,
        <yasunari.takiguchi@...y.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/15] [dt-bindings] [media] Add document file and
 driver for Sony CXD2880 DVB-T2/T tuner + demodulator

Dear Mauro

Thanks for your kind review during your busy schedule.

I will confirm with your findings and discuss about them
(how to change our codes) in our team.

Regards & Thanks
Takiguchi

On 2017/06/13 23:38, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hi Takiguchi-san,
> 
> Em Thu, 25 May 2017 15:15:39 +0900
> "Takiguchi, Yasunari" <Yasunari.Takiguchi@...y.com> escreveu:
> 
>> Hi, all
>>
>> I sent the patch series of Sony CXD2880 DVB-T2/T tuner + demodulator driver on Apr/14.
>> Are there any comments, advices and review results for them?
> 
> Usually, reviewing drivers takes more time, as one needs to reserve a
> long period of time for reviewing. Sorry for the delay.
> 
>> I'd like to get better understanding of current review status for our codes.
> 
> Just sent today a review. There are some things that need to be
> changed in order to get it into a better shape and make it easier
> to review. In particular, it should be using some Kernel internal APIs,
> instead of coming with re-implementation of existing core code. That's fine. 
> It is very unusual that the first contributions from a new Kernel
> developer to gets everything the way as it is expected mainstream ;-)
> 
> One thing that come into my mind, besides what was already commented,
> is that it seems you added an abstraction layer. We don't like such
> layers very much, as it makes harder to understand the driver, usually
> for very little benefit.
> 
> On this first review, I didn't actually try to understand what's
> going on there. As the driver doesn't contain any comments inside,
> it makes harder to understand why some things were coded using
> such approach.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mauro

Powered by blists - more mailing lists