linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/44] iommu/dma: don't rely on DMA_ERROR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:37:00 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org,
        linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, openrisc@...ts.librecores.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/44] iommu/dma: don't rely on DMA_ERROR_CODE

On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:59:07PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> On 08/06/17 14:25, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > DMA_ERROR_CODE is not a public API and will go away soon.  dma dma-iommu
> > driver already implements a proper ->mapping_error method, so it's only
> > using the value internally.  Add a new local define using the value
> > that arm64 which is the only current user of dma-iommu.
> 
> It would be fine to just use 0, since dma-iommu already makes sure that
> that will never be allocated for a valid DMA address.

I'll change it to 0.

> Otherwise, looks good!

Can you give me a formal ACK or Reviewed-by: ?