linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:17:43 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 16:46:33 -0700 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Andrew Morton
> <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 18:56:30 -0700 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> >> >> Caused by commit
> >> >>
> >> >>   088a5ecf7581 ("include/linux/string.h: add the option of fortified string.h functions")
> >> >>
> >> >> We really need to fix all the known problems it detects *before*
> >> >> merging this commit ...
> >> >>
> >> >> I have reverted it for today.
> >> >
> >> > I am still needing to revert this every day ...
> >>
> >> I sent a series for -mm (or maintainers) to merge that should catch
> >> everything. Do you want me to carry it in my kspp tree instead? (My
> >> original intention was to carry all the fixes and the fortify patch in
> >> kspp but akpm took it into -mm somewhat unexpectedly, not that I'm
> >> complaining.)
> >
> > This is all getting a bit foggy in my mind.  Can we please have a full
> > resend of everything?  Sufficient to hopefully produce a tree which has
> > no build-time or run-time regressions?  Including the buildbot's
> > recently-reported alpha and xtensa issues?
> 
> It's been sent a few times (and a few fixes have been collected in
> other trees already). What I've got in my for-next/kspp tree right now
> is all the fixes that haven't already been picked up by other tree
> maintainers, and I added the fortify patch itself to the end of the
> tree too now since sfr asked for that a few hours ago.

I think it's best to try to keep everything in a single tree, with
maintainer acks where possible.

I do this stuff all the time - please just send everything at me when
we think we have all the fixes and I'll sort it out.