linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] mtd: block2mtd: Add support for specifying MTD write size and subpage shift

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 18 Jun 2017 12:11:40 +0200
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mtd: block2mtd: Add support for specifying MTD write
 size and subpage shift

Pavel,

Am 18.06.2017 um 12:06 schrieb Pavel Machek:
> Hi!
> 
>>>>>> Am 02.06.2017 um 17:43 schrieb Pali Rohár:
>>>>>>> It is needed for creating emulated devices suitable for using in UBI layer
>>>>>>> and with UBIFS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why?
>>>>>
>>>>> ubifs depends on write size of nand. And without those parameters as
>>>>> specified in cover letter I'm unable to mount N900 rootfs image exported
>>>>> via block2mtd. ubifs reject such image.
>>>>
>>>> Hmm, so you render block2mtd into a semi-NAND chip? :)
>>>
>>> Probably you can call it like that. But it is still MTD device...
>>
>> This is what I meant in my other mail.
>> You add NAND specific properties but still denote it as MTD_RAM/ROM.
>> I'm not sure whether this is a good idea.
> 
> Can you suggest any other way for Pali to mount rootfs image on his
> PC?

Are you my micro manager? ;-)

As stated in my other mail, we have nandsim and there is work going on
to allow specifying arbitrary NAND sizes.
An alternative approach can be found here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/12/296

Thanks,
//richard