linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/4] pwm: mediatek: fix clk issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:48:07 +0800
From:   Zhi Mao <zhi.mao@...iatek.com>
To:     John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>
CC:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        "linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Zhenbao Liu (刘振宝) 
        <Zhenbao.Liu@...iatek.com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
        Sean Wang (王志亘) 
        <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        YT Shen (沈岳霆) 
        <Yt.Shen@...iatek.com>,
        Yingjoe Chen (??英洲) 
        <Yingjoe.Chen@...iatek.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/4] pwm: mediatek: fix clk issue

On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 20:07 +0800, John Crispin wrote:
> Hi
> 
> comments inline
> 
> 
> > +static int mtk_pwm_clk_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> > +{

> > +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(pc->clks[MTK_CLK_PWM1 + pwm->hwpwm]);
> > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > +		clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clks[MTK_CLK_MAIN]);
> > +		clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clks[MTK_CLK_TOP]);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> Rather than disabling the already prepared clks in each error path and 
> then returning, you should use goto err_clk_{top,main,pwm1} in the same 
> style as what this patch removes from mtk_pwm_probe()
> 
> > +	return ret;
> > +}

> >   static inline u32 mtk_pwm_readl(struct mtk_pwm_chip *chip, unsigned int num,
> >   				unsigned int offset)
> >   {

> > @@ -91,10 +128,12 @@ static int mtk_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> >   	if (clkdiv > 7)
> >   		return -EINVAL;
> >   
> > -	mtk_pwm_writel(pc, pwm->hwpwm, PWMCON, BIT(15) | BIT(3) | clkdiv);
> > +	mtk_pwm_writel(pc, pwm->hwpwm, PWMCON, BIT(15) | clkdiv);
> 
> this chunk needs to go into its own patch
> 

> >   
> > @@ -102,11 +141,8 @@ static int mtk_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> >   {
> >   
> > -	ret = clk_prepare(pc->clks[MTK_CLK_PWM1 + pwm->hwpwm]);
> > -	if (ret < 0)
> > -		return ret;
> > +	mtk_pwm_clk_enable(chip, pwm);
> You need to check the error code here and return if clk enabling failed
> 

<....>
Hi John,
For these above comments, I will modified as your suggestions in the
next release.

> > 
> >   
> >   static int mtk_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >   {
> >   	struct mtk_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > -	unsigned int i;
> > -
> > -	for (i = 0; i < pc->chip.npwm; i++)
> > -		pwm_disable(&pc->chip.pwms[i]);
> why are you removing this chunk ?
> 
>      John
> 

After refering to some other vendor's pwm driver, we think the
"pwm_disable" is no need, and framework control flow should disable all
the pwms before removing them,
so we remove it.

Regards,
Zhi

> >   
> >   	return pwmchip_remove(&pc->chip);
> >   }
>