linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm, memory_hotplug: do not assume ZONE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:16:57 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Reza Arbab <arbab@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Yasuaki Ishimatsu <yasu.isimatu@...il.com>,
        qiuxishi@...wei.com, Kani Toshimitsu <toshi.kani@....com>,
        slaoub@...il.com, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>,
        Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm, memory_hotplug: do not assume ZONE_NORMAL is
 default kernel zone

[Again, please try to trim your quoted response to the minimum]

On Thu 22-06-17 10:32:43, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:37:46AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> >@@ -938,6 +938,27 @@ void __ref move_pfn_range_to_zone(struct zone *zone,
> > }
> > 
> > /*
> >+ * Returns a default kernel memory zone for the given pfn range.
> >+ * If no kernel zone covers this pfn range it will automatically go
> >+ * to the ZONE_NORMAL.
> >+ */
> >+struct zone *default_zone_for_pfn(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
> >+		unsigned long nr_pages)
> >+{
> >+	struct pglist_data *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
> >+	int zid;
> >+
> >+	for (zid = 0; zid <= ZONE_NORMAL; zid++) {
> >+		struct zone *zone = &pgdat->node_zones[zid];
> >+
> >+		if (zone_intersects(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages))
> >+			return zone;
> >+	}
> >+
> >+	return &pgdat->node_zones[ZONE_NORMAL];
> >+}
> 
> Hmm... a corner case jumped into my mind which may invalidate this
> calculation.
> 
> The case is:
> 
> 
>        Zone:         | DMA   | DMA32      | NORMAL       |
>                      v       v            v              v
>        
>        Phy mem:      [           ]     [                  ]
>        
>                      ^           ^     ^                  ^
>        Node:         |   Node0   |     |      Node1       |
>                              A   B     C  D
> 
> 
> The key point is
> 1. There is a hole between Node0 and Node1
> 2. The hole sits in a non-normal zone
> 
> Let's mark the boundary as A, B, C, D. Then we would have
> node0->zone[dma21] = [A, B]
> node1->zone[dma32] = [C, D]
> 
> If we want to hotplug a range in [B, C] on node0, it looks not that bad. While
> if we want to hotplug a range in [B, C] on node1, it will introduce the
> overlapped zone. Because the range [B, C] intersects none of the existing
> zones on node1.
> 
> Do you think this is possible?

Yes, it is possible. I would be much more more surprised if it was real
as well. Fixing that would require to use arch_zone_{lowest,highest}_possible_pfn
which is not available after init section disappears and I am not even
sure we should care. I would rather wait for a real life example of such
a configuration to fix it.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs