linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4] acpi: acpica: fix acpi parse and parseext cache leaks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:26:00 +0900
From:   Seunghun Han <kkamagui@...il.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] acpi: acpica: fix acpi parse and parseext cache leaks

Hello, Andy.

Thank you for your reply.

Patch V4 is the last patch which is applied all changes from original code.
Due to maintainer's advice, Patch V1, V2, V3 have reverted and I made
the latest patch, Patch V4.
(the review is here, https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/278)

Therefore, it seems that incremental patch is not needed.

If you have any request, please let me know.

Best regards.

ps) I am sending email again after removing HTML part.

2017-06-26 7:12 GMT+09:00 Seunghun Han <kkamagui@...il.com>:
> Hello, Andy.
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> Patch V4 is the last patch which is applied all changes from original code.
> Due to reviewer's advice, Patch V1, V2, V3 has reverted and I made the
> latest patch, Patch V4.
> Therefore, it seems that incremental patch is not needed.
>
> If you have any requests, please let me know.
>
> Best regards.
>
>
> 2017년 6월 26일 (월) 오전 1:13, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>님이 작성:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Seunghun Han <kkamagui@...il.com> wrote:
>> > I'm Seunghun Han, and I work for National Security Research Institute of
>> > South Korea.
>>
>>
>> > -                                       /* Clean up */
>> > -                                       do {
>> > -                                               if (op) {
>> > -                                                       status2 =
>> > -
>> > acpi_ps_complete_this_op
>> > -                                                           (walk_state,
>> > op);
>> > -                                                       if (ACPI_FAILURE
>> > -                                                           (status2)) {
>> > -
>> > return_ACPI_STATUS
>> > -
>> > (status2);
>> > -                                                       }
>> > -                                               }
>> > -
>> > -                                               acpi_ps_pop_scope(&
>> > -
>> > (walk_state->
>> > -
>> > parser_state),
>> > -                                                                 &op,
>> > -
>> > &walk_state->
>> > -
>> > arg_types,
>> > -
>> > &walk_state->
>> > -
>> > arg_count);
>> > -
>> > -                                       } while (op);
>>
>> I didn't get, do you send an incremental patch as a new version?!
>>
>> --
>> With Best Regards,
>> Andy Shevchenko