linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 031/108] jump label: pass kbuild_cflags when checking for asm goto support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 27 Jun 2017 13:44:06 +0000
From:   "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)" <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy <glebfm@...linux.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Lin <dtwlin@...gle.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Anton V. Boyarshinov" <boyarsh@...linux.org>,
        "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 031/108] jump label: pass kbuild_cflags when checking
 for asm goto support

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:33:42PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 06:29:18PM +0300, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 07:52:37PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > 4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>> >
>> > ------------------
>> >
>> > From: David Lin <dtwlin@...gle.com>
>> >
>> >
>> > [ Upstream commit 35f860f9ba6aac56cc38e8b18916d833a83f1157 ]
>>
>> This commit introduced a regression which was fixed in
>> 7292ae3d5a18fb922be496e6bb687647193569b4.
>> Backport the fix too, please.
>>
>> As long as there is no gcc-plugin support in 4.4, 35f860f9ba6a does not
>> break anything there, AFAICS.
>
>Thanks for letting me know, now queued up.

Hey Greg,

I've also queued this up in the pull request I sent a few days ago, you'll
end up seeing a conflict when you look at that branch.

-- 

Thanks,
Sasha