linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 00/12] blktrace: output cgroup info

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Jun 2017 14:50:20 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        hch@....de, rostedt@...dmis.org, lizefan@...wei.com,
        Kernel-team@...com, Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/12] blktrace: output cgroup info

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 05:25:25PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 02:57:38PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Personally I don't care that much, but the risk of conflicts is much
> > higher on the block side, than on the kernfs side. So might be the
> > path of less resistance to pull it through the block tree. And I'd be
> > happy to do that, if the sign offs on the kernfs side are sufficient.
> 
> Block tree it is then.  Let's wait for Greg to respond.

block tree is fine with me, I'll go ack the kernfs patches now.

thanks,

greg k-h