linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/9] Documentation: dt-bindings: add support for mailbox client shared memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 30 Jun 2017 11:24:03 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Roy Franz <roy.franz@...ium.com>,
        Harb Abdulhamid <harba@...eaurora.org>,
        Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Loc Ho <lho@....com>, Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@....com>,
        Matt Sealey <neko@...uhatsu.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] Documentation: dt-bindings: add support for mailbox
 client shared memory



On 28/06/17 23:56, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:55:05PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Many users of the mailbox controllers depend on the shared memory between the
>> two end points to exchange the main data while using simple doorbell mechanism
>> to alert the end points of the presence of a message.
> 
> "dt-bindings: mailbox: ..." for the subject.
> 

Fixed locally now.

>>
>> This patch defines device tree bindings to represent such shared memory in a
>> generic way.
>>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mailbox.txt        | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> 
> Otherwise,
> 
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> 

Thanks

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep