lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 4 Jul 2017 18:20:10 +0530
From:   Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>
To:     Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC:     "GregKroah-Hartmangregkh@...uxfoundation.org" 
        <GregKroah-Hartmangregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        "linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>
Subject: Re: [linux-next][PATCH] usb: dwc3: omap: remove IRQ_NOAUTOEN used
 with shared irq

Hi,

On 7/3/2017 11:58 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> 
> 
> On 07/02/2017 11:27 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Saturday 01 July 2017 01:04 AM, Strashko, Grygorii wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/29/2017 01:03 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>> * Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com> [170628 21:21]:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday 29 June 2017 05:01 AM, Strashko, Grygorii wrote:
>>>>>> IRQ_NOAUTOEN can't be used with shared IRQs and Kernel now will
>>>>>> triggers
>>>>>> warning if it happns, since commit 04c848d39879 ("genirq: Warn when
>>>>>> IRQ_NOAUTOEN is used with shared interrupts"). And this is the
>>>>>> case for
>>>>>> OMAP DWC 3 driver.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hence, remove IRQ_NOAUTOEN flag and instead call disable_irq() before
>>>>>> disabling PM runtime in probe error path handling.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or, how about requesting the irq at the end of probe after extcon
>>>>> registration?
>>>>
>>>> Hmm yeah, what prevents the issue that we tried to fix with commit
>>>> 12a7f17fac5b ("usb: dwc3: omap: fix race of pm runtime with irq handler
>>>> in probe")?
>>>
>>> No, I think. There should be the disable_irq() call any way
>>> before pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);| pm_runtime_disable(dev); -
>>> once IRQ is requested driver can't know if IRQ handler is running now
>>> or not
>>> unless it will call disable_irq()/free_irq().
>>>
>>> But, I've also thought about moving request_irq() down (seems
>>> it can be moved even after of_platform_populate()).
>>> looks like it can be separate patch.
>>>
>>
>> commit 12a7f17fac5b says PM runtime can race with IRQ handler when
>> deferred probing happening due to extcon, therefore IRQ_NOAUTOEN was set
>> and disable_irq() call was added. If IRQ handler registration is moved
>> to a place after of_platform_populate(), then we can be sure that extcon
>> is registered and there wont be any deferred probe or race with irq
>> handler and PM runtime. Would disable_irq() still be needed then?
>>
> 
> You might be correct, so feel free to send a patch.

Ok, will send a patch moving irq registration after of_platform_populate().

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ