linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/5] drivers: Add boot constraints core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 4 Jul 2017 12:15:36 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <enrico.weigelt@...3.net>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        rnayak@...eaurora.org, Shiraz Hashim <shashim@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] drivers: Add boot constraints core

On 03-07-17, 16:07, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 11:45:52AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > The above regulator-min/max-microvolt values I mentioned were for the regulator
> > device and not what the consumers would request. Yes, DMA will request something
> 
> If you're putting the maximum possible range that the physical regulator
> can supply into machine constraints then you really haven't understood
> what machine constraints are at all.

I wasn't referring to the limits of the physical regulators but the min/max that
the consumers can set on a particular platform.

> No, it really shouldn't.  Please read what I wrote.

Sorry about that. Understood it now.

-- 
viresh