linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] base: dma-mapping: Export commonly used symbols

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 6 Jul 2017 00:22:35 +0900
From:   Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     "open list:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
        Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>,
        Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@...eaurora.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] base: dma-mapping: Export commonly used symbols

Hi Christoph,

Thanks for comments!

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> Please use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for any of these exports, as they are
> internal linux implementration details by any definition of it.

Right. I typically lean towards EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(), but was misled by
existing EXPORT_SYMBOL()s in the file. Will fix.

>
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 04:12:11PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> There is nothing wrong in having a loadable module implementing DMA API,
>> for example to be used for sub-devices registered by the module.
>> However, most of the functions from dma-mapping do not have their
>> symbols exported, making it impossible to use them from loadable modules.
>
> I'd like to see the patches for this use case as well.  We don't
> generally export symbols without seeing the users.

Generally the user is a work in progress that should be posted in a
very near future. You can find a reference to our downstream tree at
chromium.org in the cover letter. Obviously I don't mind including
patches from this series in the driver series later and that's one of
the reasons for this series being RFC.

Best regards,
Tomasz