linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] ALSA: ac97: add an ac97 bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 05 Jul 2017 22:21:39 +0200
From:   Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:     "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        "Haojian Zhuang" <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        "Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "Lee Jones" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        "Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@...afoo.de>,
        "Charles Keepax" <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
        "Jaroslav Kysela" <perex@...ex.cz>,
        "Daniel Mack" <daniel@...que.org>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
        <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] ALSA: ac97: add an ac97 bus

Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> writes:

> On Tue, 04 Jul 2017 21:37:48 +0200,
> Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>> 
>> Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> writes:
>> 
>> > On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 21:43:58 +0200,
>> > Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>> >> +static struct bus_type ac97_bus_type = {
>> >> +	.name		= "ac97",
>> >
>> > Name-conflict with the old ac97 bus?
>> Yeah, fair point. So what should I choose for this new one ?
>>  - ac97new
>>  - ac97bis
>>  - ac97_2
>>  - ac97reborn
>
> ac97bus
> ac97_episode_5
> ac98
> ...
>
> I have no opinion on it.
Ah clone wars one is really tempting :)
But let's have ac97bus actually.

> You can use subsys_init() for modules, it's no problem.
> When it's built for a module, all xxx_init() is handled as equivalent
> with module_init().  See linux/module.h.
>
> It's just the lack of module_exit() in your case.
Got it, I'll add it for v4.

Cheers.

-- 
Robert