linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: disallow early_pfn_to_nid on configurations which do not implement it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 5 Jul 2017 16:00:55 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>,
        Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: disallow early_pfn_to_nid on configurations which
 do not implement it

On Tue,  4 Jul 2017 09:58:03 +0200 Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:

> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> 
> early_pfn_to_nid will return node 0 if both HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID
> and HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP are disabled. It seems we are safe now
> because all architectures which support NUMA define one of them (with an
> exception of alpha which however has CONFIG_NUMA marked as broken) so
> this works as expected. It can get silently and subtly broken too
> easily, though. Make sure we fail the compilation if NUMA is enabled and
> there is no proper implementation for this function. If that ever
> happens we know that either the specific configuration is invalid
> and the fix should either disable NUMA or enable one of the above
> configs.
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -1055,6 +1055,7 @@ static inline struct zoneref *first_zones_zonelist(struct zonelist *zonelist,
>  	!defined(CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP)
>  static inline unsigned long early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn)
>  {
> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA));
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  #endif

Wouldn't this be more conventional?

--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h~a
+++ a/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -1052,7 +1052,8 @@ static inline struct zoneref *first_zone
 #endif
 
 #if !defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID) && \
-	!defined(CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP)
+	!defined(CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP) && \
+	!defined(CONFIG_NUMA)
 static inline unsigned long early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn)
 {
 	return 0;
_