linux-kernel - [patch 0/3] Re: tty contention resulting from tty_open_by

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 09 Jul 2017 12:41:53 +0100
From:   Okash Khawaja <okash.khawaja@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
        Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@...il.com>,
        Chris Brannon <chris@...-brannons.com>,
        Kirk Reiser <kirk@...sers.ca>, speakup@...ux-speakup.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: [patch 0/3] Re: tty contention resulting from tty_open_by_device export

On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 10:38:03AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Overall, the idea looks sane to me.  Keeping userspace from opening a
> tty that the kernel has opened internally makes sense, hopefully
> userspace doesn't get too confused when that happens.  I don't think we
> normally return -EBUSY from an open call, have you seen what happens
> with apps when you do this (like minicom?)
>
I tested this wil minincom, picocom and commands like "echo foo >
/dev/ttyS0". They all correctly report "Device or resource busy".

I have addressed all the comments you made. I have also split the patch
into three. Following is summary of each.

Patch 1: introduces the tty_kopen function and checks for TTY_KOPENED
Patch 2: updates speakup code to use tty_kopen instead of
        tty_open_by_driver
Patch 3: reverses the export of tty_open_by_driver

Thanks,
Okash