lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 12 Jul 2017 13:34:46 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
To:     Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc:     npiggin@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86: enable dead code and data elimination (LTO)

On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, Andi Kleen wrote:

> Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com> writes:
> >> 
> >> I think we should aim for gc-sections to be used by default and have LTO 
> >> as a possible option only.
> >
> > I agree after it starts getting implemented and debugged by small
> > system users, we could make it default in the interest of sharing
> > testing and reducing combinations.
> 
> From what i understand the main drawback in the past was
> is that various linker versions become very slow with thousands of
> sections.
> 
> So it may cost you built time. For a special small build it's probably
> ok, but you wouldn't want to make it default.
> 
> Also usually it's only useful without modules because if you
> use modules EXPORT_SYMBOL pulls in a lot of unused functions.

I created CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS mainly to avoid that issue. It is 
highly effective with either gc-sections and LTO.


Nicolas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ