linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 3/4] x86/boot/KASLR: Rename process_e820_entry() into process_mem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:19:37 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, keescook@...omium.org, matt@...eblueprint.co.uk,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
        izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com, fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com,
        thgarnie@...gle.com, n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com,
        Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/4] x86/boot/KASLR: Rename process_e820_entry() into process_mem_region()

Now process_e820_entry() is not limited to e820 entry processing, rename
it to process_mem_region(). And adjust the code comment accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
 arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
index 36ff9f729c43..99c7194f7ea6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
@@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ static unsigned long slots_fetch_random(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void process_e820_entry(struct mem_vector *entry,
+static void process_mem_region(struct mem_vector *entry,
 			       unsigned long minimum,
 			       unsigned long image_size)
 {
@@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ static void process_e820_entry(struct mem_vector *entry,
 		/* Potentially raise address to meet alignment needs. */
 		region.start = ALIGN(region.start, CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN);
 
-		/* Did we raise the address above this e820 region? */
+		/* Did we raise the address above the passed in memory entry? */
 		if (region.start > cur_entry.start + cur_entry.size)
 			return;
 
@@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ static void process_e820_entries(unsigned long minimum,
 			continue;
 		region.start = entry->addr;
 		region.size = entry->size;
-		process_e820_entry(&region, minimum, image_size);
+		process_mem_region(&region, minimum, image_size);
 		if (slot_area_index == MAX_SLOT_AREA) {
 			debug_putstr("Aborted e820 scan (slot_areas full)!\n");
 			break;
-- 
2.5.5