linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_asrc: constify snd_soc_dai

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Jul 2017 12:02:33 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Timur Tabi <timur@...i.org>,
        Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
        Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_asrc: constify snd_soc_dai_ops
 structure

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 11:18:11AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:

> I don't it's better.

> It's not that confusing if the 0/n patch cover letter is cc'd
> to all the appropriate mailing lists and all the [1..n]/n
> patches are sent with in-reply-to of the cover letter and
> send to the maintainers and appropriate mailing lists.

With large serieses like Gustavo is sending the CC list can easily hit
the points where mailing lists start blocking it, and the individual
pathces really do need to go to the relevant people so they have sight
of them.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)