lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 17 Jul 2017 05:28:20 +0300
From:   Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To:     Jacob Chen <jacobchen110@...il.com>
Cc:     "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com,
        Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>, s.nawrocki@...sung.com,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
        Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] ARM: dts: rockchip: enable RGA for rk3288 devices

Hi Jacob,

On Sunday 16 Jul 2017 12:23:02 Jacob Chen wrote:
> 2017-07-15 17:16 GMT+08:00 Laurent Pinchart:
> > On Saturday 15 Jul 2017 14:58:39 Jacob Chen wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Jacob Chen <jacob-chen@...wrt.com>
> >> ---
> >> 
> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-evb.dtsi                 | 4 ++++
> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-firefly-reload-core.dtsi | 4 ++++
> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-firefly.dtsi             | 4 ++++
> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-miqi.dts                 | 4 ++++
> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-popmetal.dts             | 4 ++++
> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-tinker.dts               | 4 ++++
> > 
> > Some boards are missing from this list (Fennec, Phycore, ...) What
> > criteria have you used to decide on which ones to enable the RGA ? That
> > should be explained in the commit message.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> I just enable the boards i have tested, because i can't make sure it
> won't break the other board because of clocks or power-domains.

Given the clocks and power domains shouldn't be board-specific, would it make 
sense to try and get the change tested on the remaining boards ? You could 
then enable the device in the SoC .dtsi file, which would be much simpler.

> >>  6 files changed, 24 insertions(+)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ