linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] MIPS: ralink: mt7620: Add missing header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:05:13 +0200
From:   Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
To:     Harvey Hunt <harvey.hunt@...tec.com>
Cc:     John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] MIPS: ralink: mt7620: Add missing header

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 02:25:46PM +0100, Harvey Hunt wrote:

> Fix a build error caused by not including <linux/bug.h>.
> 
> The following compilation errors are caused by the missing header:
> 
> arch/mips/ralink/mt7620.c: In function ‘mt7620_get_cpu_pll_rate’:
> arch/mips/ralink/mt7620.c:431:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘WARN_ON’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   WARN_ON(div >= ARRAY_SIZE(mt7620_clk_divider));
>   ^
> arch/mips/ralink/mt7620.c: In function ‘mt7620_get_sys_rate’:
> arch/mips/ralink/mt7620.c:500:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘WARN’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   if (WARN(!div, "invalid divider for OCP ratio %u", ocp_ratio))
>   ^
> arch/mips/ralink/mt7620.c: In function ‘mt7620_dram_init’:
> arch/mips/ralink/mt7620.c:619:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘BUG’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    BUG();
>    ^
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> scripts/Makefile.build:302: recipe for target 'arch/mips/ralink/mt7620.o' failed
> 
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Hunt <harvey.hunt@...tec.com>
> Cc: John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>
> Cc: linux-mips@...ux-mips.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org

Same comment as for the previous patch - looks sensible, so applied.  But
I'm wondering why I don't see this in test builds.

  Ralf