lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2017 17:04:28 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: ixp4xx - Fix error handling path in 'aead_perform()'

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Christophe JAILLET
> <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> wrote:
>> In commit 0f987e25cb8a, the source processing has been moved in front of
>> the destination processing, but the error handling path has not been
>> modified accordingly.
>> Free resources in the correct order to avoid some leaks.
>>
>> Fixes: 0f987e25cb8a ("crypto: ixp4xx - Fix false lastlen uninitialised warning")
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
>
> Thanks for spotting my mistake!
>
> I've looked at it again and think it's unfortunately still wrong with
> your patch,
> as there is a 'goto free_buf_src' after dma_pool_alloc(), and that now needs
> to jump to free_buf_dst instead. We may also need an extra check to make
> sure we don't free an uninitialized pointer again.
>
> Can you have a look at this version below and send whatever you find
> to be correct in the end?
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Coincidentally, I just came across an older patch of mine that actually
fixes the warning properly, but that for some reason ended up not
getting merged:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8236811/

How about we just revert my broken 0f987e25cb8a patch, and I apply
the mach-ixp4xx patch instead?

       Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ