linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Convert to using %pOF instead of full

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2017 13:34:12 +1000
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree\@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Anatolij Gustschin <agust@...x.de>,
        Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>,
        Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Convert to using %pOF instead of full_name

Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
>> Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> writes:
>>
>>> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
>>> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
>>> of the full path string for each node.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
>>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
>>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
>>> Cc: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@...x.de>
>>> Cc: Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>
>>> Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
>>> ---
>> ...
>>>  79 files changed, 464 insertions(+), 490 deletions(-)
>>
>> Is the plan that I'll merge this for 4.14 ?
>
> Yes, hence why it's not a series and sent to you.

OK thanks. That was a bit too subtle for me :)

cheers