linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] perf annotate: Fix wrong --show-total-period option showing number of samples

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 24 Jul 2017 10:51:58 +0900
From:   Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@...il.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] perf annotate: Fix wrong --show-total-period
 option showing number of samples

Hi Arnaldo,

Sorry, I'm too late.

On 07/21/2017 08:24 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 06:41:29PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
>> On 07/21/2017 04:19 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>> Em Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 06:36:55AM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
>>>> Currently the --show-total-period option of perf-annotate
>>>> is different from perf-report's.
> 
>>>> For example, perf-report ordinarily shows period and number of samples.
> 
>>>>    # Overhead       Samples        Period  Command  Shared Object   Symbol
>>>>         9.83%           102      84813704  test     test            [.] knapsack
> 
>>> But this is not what this patch does, it is still doing too many things,
>>> it should first add sample to those function signatures, leaving the
>>> "meat" to a followup patch, where we will not be distracted with
>>> infrastructure needed to do what you describe in the changelog.
> 
>>> I'm doing it here this time, please look at the result, later.
>   
>> ok, I'm waiting for it.
>> And if you give me some sketchy code, that's fine.
>> If you do, I'll remake this patch based on the result. :)
> 
> Take a look at the acme/tmp_perf/core, that is where I got yesterday.
> 
> - Arnaldo
> 

I fetched all branch of your repository, but it don't seem to be pushed.

$ git remote get-url acme
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git

$ git branch -a | grep acme | grep tmp | grep core
   remotes/acme/tmp.perf/core
   remotes/acme/tmp_perf.core

$ git show tmp.perf/core | head -3
commit 4827c52cd001e208704ab733a389c96ae2e70e5b
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri Jul 21 12:25:57 2017 -0700

$ git show tmp_perf.core | head -3
commit 3331778eb08a50cec959da933c040bd7fbdde396
Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Date:   Thu Jul 31 09:00:56 2014 +0300


Thanks,
Taeung