linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] selftests/vm: Add tests to validate mirror functionality with mremap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Jul 2017 07:49:38 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mike.kravetz@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] selftests/vm: Add tests to validate mirror
 functionality with mremap

On Wed 26-07-17 09:54:26, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 07/25/2017 07:06 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 25-07-17 12:06:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > [...]
> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/mremap_mirror_private_anon.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/mremap_mirror_private_anon.c
> > [...]
> >> +	ptr = mmap(NULL, alloc_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> >> +			MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
> >> +	if (ptr == MAP_FAILED) {
> >> +		perror("map() failed");
> >> +		return -1;
> >> +	}
> >> +	memset(ptr, PATTERN, alloc_size);
> >> +
> >> +	mirror_ptr =  (char *) mremap(ptr, 0, alloc_size, MREMAP_MAYMOVE);
> >> +	if (mirror_ptr == MAP_FAILED) {
> >> +		perror("mremap() failed");
> >> +		return -1;
> >> +	}
> > 
> > What is the point of this test? It will break with Mike's patch very
> > soon. Btw. it never worked.
> 
> It works now. The new 'mirrored' buffer does not have same elements
> as that of the original one.

So what exactly are you testing here? The current implementation or the
semantic of mremap. Because having a different content after mremap
doesn't make _any_ sense to me. I might be misreading the intention of
the syscall but to me it sounds like the content should be same as the
original one... If my reading is wrong then -EINVAL for anon mremaps is
simply wrong.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs