linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: Convert to using %pOF instead of full

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Jul 2017 13:02:33 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com, dan.carpenter@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Convert to using %pOF instead of full_name

Hi Rob,

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 07:27:29PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 7:04 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:42:42PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> >> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> >> of the full path string for each node.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> >> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> >> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> >> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c  |  4 ++--
> >>  arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c      | 12 ++++++------
> >>  arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> >>  3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > I've queued this and the perf patch too, but it would be good if somebody
> > could update sparse to recognise this format specifier. Currently it
> > just complains about it.
> 
> I'm happy to fix it, but I ran sparse and don't see any errors. Got a pointer?

I went back and checked again and it's not sparse that's warning, it's
actually smatch (sorry for getting that mixed up):

  arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c:85 cpu_read_enable_method() error: unrecognized %p extension 'O', treated as normal %p [smatch]

Will