linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: take memory hotplug lock within numa_zonelist_order

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:34:31 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andre Wild <wild@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: take memory hotplug lock within
 numa_zonelist_order_handler()

On Wed, 26 Jul 2017, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> Andre Wild reported the folling warning:
> 
> WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1205 at kernel/cpu.c:240 lockdep_assert_cpus_held+0x4c/0x60
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 2 PID: 1205 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.13.0-rc2-00022-gfd2b2c57ec20 #10
> Hardware name: IBM 2964 N96 702 (z/VM 6.4.0)
> task: 00000000701d8100 task.stack: 0000000073594000
> Krnl PSW : 0704f00180000000 0000000000145e24 (lockdep_assert_cpus_held+0x4c/0x60)
> ...
> Call Trace:
>  lockdep_assert_cpus_held+0x42/0x60)
>  stop_machine_cpuslocked+0x62/0xf0
>  build_all_zonelists+0x92/0x150
>  numa_zonelist_order_handler+0x102/0x150
>  proc_sys_call_handler.isra.12+0xda/0x118
>  proc_sys_write+0x34/0x48
>  __vfs_write+0x3c/0x178
>  vfs_write+0xbc/0x1a0
>  SyS_write+0x66/0xc0
>  system_call+0xc4/0x2b0
>  locks held by bash/1205:
>  #0:  (sb_writers#4){.+.+.+}, at: [<000000000037b29e>] vfs_write+0xa6/0x1a0
>  #1:  (zl_order_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<00000000002c8e4c>] numa_zonelist_order_handler+0x44/0x150
>  #2:  (zonelists_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<00000000002c8efc>] numa_zonelist_order_handler+0xf4/0x150
> Last Breaking-Event-Address:
>  [<0000000000145e20>] lockdep_assert_cpus_held+0x48/0x60
> 
> This can be easily triggered with e.g.
> 
>  >echo n > /proc/sys/vm/numa_zonelist_order
> 
> With commit 3f906ba23689a ("mm/memory-hotplug: switch locking to a
> percpu rwsem") memory hotplug locking was changed to fix a potential
> deadlock. This also switched the stop_machine() invocation within
> build_all_zonelists() to stop_machine_cpuslocked() which now expects
> that online cpus are locked when being called.
> 
> This assumption is not true if build_all_zonelists() is being called
> from numa_zonelist_order_handler(). In order to fix this simply add a
> mem_hotplug_begin()/mem_hotplug_done() pair to numa_zonelist_order_handler().

Sorry, I missed that call path when I did the conversion. So yes, that
needs some protection....

Thanks,

	tglx