linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [v2] iopoll: avoid -Wint-in-bool-context warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Jul 2017 14:39:11 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@...gutronix.de>,
        Ramesh Shanmugasundaram <ramesh.shanmugasundaram@...renesas.com>,
        "Alex A. Mihaylov" <minimumlaw@...bler.ru>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] iopoll: avoid -Wint-in-bool-context warning

On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:28:06 +0100 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 03:37:32PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > When we pass the result of a multiplication as the timeout or
> > the delay, we can get a warning:
> 
> This'd be easier if you sent each of the changes separately...

I think it's OK - the patch encapsulates a single concept.  Doesn't
matter much either way, unless someone wants to take one part only into
a particular tree(?).