linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] EDAC, ghes: Make it a proper module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 27 Jul 2017 07:20:48 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "mchehab@...radead.org" <mchehab@...radead.org>,
        "tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc:     "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@....com>,
        "rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] EDAC, ghes: Make it a proper module

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 07:24:59PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> Using sb_edac does not change the fact that it is FF.  I do not think
> you'd see normal CEs on your box.

I guess we should add some blurb to EDAC to say that on FF systems,
error counts are unreliable or even non-existent.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--