lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2017 08:23:59 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     janani-sankarababu <jananis37@...il.com>
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org,
        jeyu@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
        tj@...nel.org, prarit@...hat.com, lokeshvutla@...com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init:main.c: Fixed issues in Block comments and removed
 braces in single statement if block

On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 11:37:33 +0530
janani-sankarababu <jananis37@...il.com> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Janani S <jananis37@...il.com>
> 
> ---
>  init/main.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index 052481f..f8eb4966 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -181,7 +181,8 @@ static bool __init obsolete_checksetup(char *line)
>  				/* Already done in parse_early_param?
>  				 * (Needs exact match on param part).
>  				 * Keep iterating, as we can have early
> -				 * params and __setups of same names 8( */
> +				 * params and __setups of same names

Why did you get rid of the "8(" part? Yeah, it's a kind of an old
fashion emoji, but it helps make the code stand out as something that
we can improve on in the future.

> +				 */
>  				if (line[n] == '\0' || line[n] == '=')
>  					had_early_param = true;
>  			} else if (!p->setup_func) {
> @@ -693,9 +694,9 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init start_kernel(void)
>  	arch_post_acpi_subsys_init();
>  	sfi_init_late();
>  
> -	if (efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES)) {
> +	if (efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES))
>  		efi_free_boot_services();
> -	}
> +

Honestly, I'm not too thrilled with these patches. It causes churn to
the code history with very little benefit. Usually these types of clean
ups are done when the code is modified for functional reasons.

Brackets for single instruction blocks isn't needed. But it's not
something we should go out of our way to "fix".

-- Steve


>  
>  	/* Do the rest non-__init'ed, we're now alive */
>  	rest_init();

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ