linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 04 Aug 2017 09:36:26 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
        Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with Linus' tree

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> writes:

> Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree got a
> conflict in:
>
>   drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/ops.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   bf8b286f86fc ("iwlwifi: mvm: defer setting IWL_MVM_STATUS_IN_HW_RESTART")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
>   7174beb60c53 ("iwlwifi: refactor firmware debug code")
>
> from the wireless-drivers-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Thanks, the resolution looks good. I'll notify Dave about this when I
send the wireless-drivers-next pull request to him.

-- 
Kalle Valo