linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 06/13] iommu/amd: copy old trans table from old kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 4 Aug 2017 14:21:16 +0200
From:   Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
To:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc:     iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 06/13] iommu/amd: copy old trans table from old kernel

On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 07:37:22PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>  static void init_device_table_dma(void)
>  {
> @@ -2137,9 +2140,49 @@ static void early_enable_iommu(struct amd_iommu *iommu)
>  static void early_enable_iommus(void)
>  {
>  	struct amd_iommu *iommu;
> +	bool is_pre_disabled = false;
>  
> -	for_each_iommu(iommu)
> -		early_enable_iommu(iommu);
> +	for_each_iommu(iommu) {
> +		if (!translation_pre_enabled(iommu)) {
> +			is_pre_disabled = true;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}

I think this could be easier if you make 'is_pre_disabled' a global state
bool variable with reversed meaning and initialize it with 'true'.
Basically

	static bool __init amd_iommu_pre_enabled = true;

And set this variable to 'false' when you find a already disabled IOMMU
during initialization. Then you can remove the code above.

> +
> +	if (is_pre_disabled) {
> +		for_each_iommu(iommu)
> +			early_enable_iommu(iommu);

		return
	}

> +	} else {

And remove this to get rid of one indendation level for the code below.

> +		pr_warn("Translation is already enabled - trying to copy translation structures\n");
> +		if (copy_device_table()) {

Seeing how the return value of copy_device_table() is used, it makes
sense to change its return-type to bool. This way it is also easier to
see which one is the sucess and which one the failure case.