linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3] get_maintainer: Prepare for separate MAINTAINERS files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Aug 2017 12:33:00 -0700
From:   Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] get_maintainer: Prepare for separate MAINTAINERS files

On 08/06/17 20:32, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-08-06 at 19:16 -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 08/04/17 21:45, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> Allow for MAINTAINERS to become a directory and if it is,
>>> read all the files in the directory for maintained sections.
>>>
>>> Optionally look for all files named MAINTAINERS in directories
>>> excluding the .git directory by using --find-maintainer-files.
>>>
>>> This optional feature adds ~.3 seconds of CPU on an Intel
>>> i5-6200 with an SSD.
>>>
>>> Miscellanea:
>>>
>>> o Create a read_maintainer_file subroutine from the existing code
>>> o Test only the existence of MAINTAINERS, not whether it's a file
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> < snip > 
>>
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> In the three versions of this patch, I have not seen any description
>> of what is wrong with the current single MAINTAINERS file, or why the
>> proposed change is an improvement. Could you please add that
>> information?
> 
> It's really up to Linus.
> 
> He's the one who wants to separate the MAINTAINERS
> file as he's the one that has to deal with the
> merges.
> 
> This is only to enable the script to still function
> if the file is split up.


Thanks, that gave me enough of a clue to find the threads titled

   [PATCH Y.A. RESEND] MAINTAINERS: fix alpha. ordering

and

   [PATCH RESEND v4] MAINTAINERS: fix lots of alphabetic ordering

tl;dr is that MAINTAINERS causes annoying merge conflicts for Linus,
and he is open to ideas to reduce that pain, including possibly
splitting MAINTAINERS into a number of files.

-Frank