lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 18:42:21 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: use IPU for cold files We expect cold files write data sequentially, but sometimes some of small data can be updated, which incurs fragmentation. Let's avoid that. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org> --- fs/f2fs/segment.h | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h index 6b871b492fd5..7f700e54b77d 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h @@ -577,6 +577,10 @@ static inline bool need_inplace_update_policy(struct inode *inode, if (test_opt(sbi, LFS)) return false; + /* if this is cold file, we should overwrite to avoid fragmentation */ + if (file_is_cold(inode)) + return true; + if (policy & (0x1 << F2FS_IPU_FORCE)) return true; if (policy & (0x1 << F2FS_IPU_SSR) && need_SSR(sbi)) -- 2.13.0.rc1.294.g07d810a77f-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists