[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 00:04:49 -0400
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@...adcom.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Chaitra Basappa <chaitra.basappa@...adcom.com>,
Suganath Prabu Subramani
<suganath-prabu.subramani@...adcom.com>,
Sathya Prakash Veerichetty <sathya.prakash@...adcom.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
martin.petersen@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] mpt3sas driver NVMe support:
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 08:45:25AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 20:01 +0530, Kashyap Desai wrote:
> >
> > We have to attempt this use case and see how it behaves. I have not
> > tried this, so not sure if things are really bad or just some tuning
> > may be helpful. I will revert back to you on this.
> >
> > I understood request as - We need some udev rules to be working well
> > for *same* NVME drives if it is behind <mpt3sas> or native <nvme>.
> > Example - If user has OS installed on NVME drive which is behind
> > <mpt3sas> driver as SCSI disk should be able to boot if he/she hooked
> > same NVME drive which is detected by native <nvme> driver (and vice
> > versa.)
>
> It's not just the udev rules, it's the tools as well; possibly things
> like that nvme-cli toolkit Intel is doing.
It looks like they can make existing nvme tooling work with little
effort if they have the driver implement NVME_IOCTL_ADMIN_COMMAND, and
then have their driver build the MPI NVMe Encapsulated Request from that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists