linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 16/16] perf tools: Add support for SPF events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 9 Aug 2017 07:13:36 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kirill@...temov.name,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, mhocko@...nel.org, dave@...olabs.net,
        jack@...e.cz, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        benh@...nel.crashing.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, paulus@...ba.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, hpa@...or.com,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        haren@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        npiggin@...il.com, bsingharora@...il.com,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/16] perf tools: Add support for SPF events

On 08/08/2017 08:05 PM, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> Add support for the new speculative faults events.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 2 ++
>  tools/perf/util/evsel.c               | 2 ++
>  tools/perf/util/parse-events.c        | 8 ++++++++
>  tools/perf/util/parse-events.l        | 2 ++
>  tools/perf/util/python.c              | 2 ++
>  5 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> index b1c0b187acfe..fbfb03dff334 100644
> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -111,6 +111,8 @@ enum perf_sw_ids {
>  	PERF_COUNT_SW_EMULATION_FAULTS		= 8,
>  	PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY			= 9,
>  	PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT		= 10,
> +	PERF_COUNT_SW_SPF_DONE			= 11,
> +	PERF_COUNT_SW_SPF_FAILED		= 12,
>  

PERF_COUNT_SW_SPF_FAULTS makes sense but not the FAILED one. IIRC,
there are no error path counting in perf SW events at the moment.
SPF_FAULTS and SPF_FAILS are VM internal events like THP collapse
etc. IMHO it should be added as a VM statistics counter or as a
trace point event instead.