linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix y2038 issues for security/keys subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2017 10:00:31 +0800
From:   Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, marc.dionne@...istor.com,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix y2038 issues for security/keys subsystem

Hi Arnd,

On 9 August 2017 at 16:44, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 4:51 AM, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org> wrote:
>> Since 'time_t', 'timeval' and 'timespec' types are not year 2038 safe on
>> 32 bits system, this patchset tries to fix this issues for security/keys
>> subsystem and net/rxrpc subsystem which is connected with security/keys
>> subsystem.
>>
>> Baolin Wang (3):
>>   security: keys: Replace time_t/timespec with time64_t
>>   security: keys: Replace time_t with time64_t for struct
>>     key_preparsed_payload
>>   net: rxrpc: Replace time_t type with time64_t type
>
> Hi David,
>
> I did a private review before Baolin posted these patches, this version look
> correct to me, though I would like to see some clarification from you for the
> rxrpc portion, I'll reply there separately.
>
> All three patches
>
> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Thanks for your reviewed tag.

-- 
Baolin.wang
Best Regards