lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2017 17:23:52 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     riel@...hat.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mike.kravetz@...cle.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, fweimer@...hat.com, colm@...costs.net,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org,
        luto@...capital.net, wad@...omium.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        kirill@...temov.name, dave.hansen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm,fork: introduce MADV_WIPEONFORK

On Sun 06-08-17 10:04:25, Rik van Riel wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 17921b0390b4..db1fb2802ecc 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -659,6 +659,13 @@ static __latent_entropy int dup_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  		tmp->vm_flags &= ~(VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT);
>  		tmp->vm_next = tmp->vm_prev = NULL;
>  		file = tmp->vm_file;
> +
> +		/* With VM_WIPEONFORK, the child gets an empty VMA. */
> +		if (tmp->vm_flags & VM_WIPEONFORK) {
> +			tmp->vm_file = file = NULL;
> +			tmp->vm_ops = NULL;
> +		}

What about VM_SHARED/|VM)MAYSHARE flags. Is it OK to keep the around? At
least do_anonymous_page SIGBUS on !vm_ops && VM_SHARED. Or do I miss
where those flags are cleared?

> +
>  		if (file) {
>  			struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
>  			struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ